Clay Travis and Buck Sexton focused on the Florida Senate race, where Democratic voters selected Angie Nixon, a candidate the hosts described as a democratic socialist, over former Trump impeachment figure Alex Vindman. Clay and Buck argued that Nixon’s victory reflects the growing influence of the Democratic Socialists of America and the broader progressive movement within the Democratic Party. They examined whether left-wing primary winners could create challenges for Democrats in general elections, particularly in states such as Florida, where many voters have personal or family experiences with socialist governments in countries like Cuba and Venezuela. The hosts also referenced recent socialist-backed victories in other states and debated the national trajectory of progressive politics.

The program devoted significant attention to the closely watched Alaska Senate race and ongoing concerns about Alaska’s ranked-choice voting system. Clay and Buck sharply criticized the presence of another candidate named Dan Sullivan on the ballot, referring to him as a “decoy” candidate designed to create voter confusion and potentially siphon votes from incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan. They argued that the tactic raises questions about election integrity and could have major consequences in what may become a highly competitive Senate contest. The hosts repeatedly emphasized that even a small number of mistaken votes could affect control of the U.S. Senate.

Clay also shared details about his newly launched Sport and State media platform, explaining that the website will feature the video simulcast of the Clay and Buck program along with coverage of sports, culture, and public policy issues. He discussed the growth of the show’s audience, efforts to expand digital distribution, and plans to reach younger demographics through new media channels.

Clay and Buck addressed a moment from the South Carolina Senate debate in which Darlene Graham was asked whether Taiwan and the South China Sea are national security issues for the United States. Graham responded that national security was not her area of expertise and acknowledged that she was not well informed on the topic. Clay and Buck argued that the answer was deeply concerning for a sitting senator and candidate seeking a full six-year term. The hosts contended that foreign policy, Taiwan-China relations, military readiness, and national security are among the most important responsibilities facing U.S. senators and that candidates should possess at least a foundational understanding of those issues.

Clay and Buck welcomed guest Brittany Hugoboom, creator of Evie magazine, the anti-Cosmopolitan for millennial and Gen Z women: Evie magazine. Vanity Fair dubbed her "the new Camille Paglia," while Evie has gone viral for everything from its milkmaid dress to its provocative Sex Issue aimed at conservative women.Hugoboom explained that the publication was created as an alternative to traditional women’s magazines, focusing on beauty, femininity, relationships, family life, and lifestyle content from a more traditional perspective. The discussion explored the magazine’s growth, its appeal among younger women, and what Hugoboom sees as a gap in the marketplace created by legacy media organizations increasingly embracing progressive cultural trends.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton: 

X - https://x.com/clayandbuck

FB -

In Hour 1 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show, Clay and Buck opened with extensive analysis of the latest 2026 primary election results, focusing on Florida, Alaska, and Wyoming. The hosts celebrated Byron Donalds’ decisive victory in the Florida Republican gubernatorial primary, arguing that his performance positions him as the overwhelming favorite in the upcoming governor’s race. They also discussed the broader implications of Florida’s Republican primary outcomes, including strong performances by other GOP candidates and several notable losses by Trump-endorsed contenders. The conversation centered on the future of Florida politics, Republican electoral strategy, and how the Sunshine State continues to move further right in statewide elections.

A major segment of Hour 1 focused on the Florida Senate race, where Democratic voters selected Angie Nixon, a candidate the hosts described as a democratic socialist, over former Trump impeachment figure Alex Vindman. Clay and Buck argued that Nixon’s victory reflects the growing influence of the Democratic Socialists of America and the broader progressive movement within the Democratic Party. They examined whether left-wing primary winners could create challenges for Democrats in general elections, particularly in states such as Florida, where many voters have personal or family experiences with socialist governments in countries like Cuba and Venezuela. The hosts also referenced recent socialist-backed victories in other states and debated the national trajectory of progressive politics.

The program devoted significant attention to the closely watched Alaska Senate race and ongoing concerns about Alaska’s ranked-choice voting system. Clay and Buck sharply criticized the presence of another candidate named Dan Sullivan on the ballot, referring to him as a “decoy” candidate designed to create voter confusion and potentially siphon votes from incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan. They argued that the tactic raises questions about election integrity and could have major consequences in what may become a highly competitive Senate contest. The hosts repeatedly emphasized that even a small number of mistaken votes could affect control of the U.S. Senate.

Building on the Alaska discussion, the hosts revisited the controversial 2008 prosecution of former Alaska Senator Ted Stevens. Buck detailed how Stevens was convicted shortly before his reelection bid, only for the case to later collapse amid allegations of prosecutorial misconduct and withheld exculpatory evidence. The segment explored how the Stevens case altered the political landscape, including its potential impact on the passage of the Affordable Care Act. This evolved into a broader conversation about the use of prosecutorial power in American politics and accusations of politically motivated investigations.

Clay and Buck then examined what they view as a long history of legal actions directed against Republican political figures. They discussed cases involving Ted Stevens, Scooter Libby, Scott Walker, Rick Perry, Bob McDonnell, Chris Christie, and President Donald Trump. The hosts argued that Trump’s political and legal victories represented a significant rejection of what they characterize as the weaponization of the justice system. They debated whether enough accountability has been imposed on officials who pursued investigations against Trump and other Republican leaders and considered the broader implications for public trust in government institutions.

Another topic during Hour 1 involved the state of the national media. The hosts argued that traditional media organizations have suffered a collapse in credibility and suggested that President Donald Trump played a major role in exposing media bias. They connected this argument to wider discussions about political power, public perception, and the role of journalism in modern American politics.

Clay also shared details about his newly launched Sport and State media platform, explaining that the website will feature the video simulcast of the Clay and Buck program along with coverage of sports, culture, and public policy issues. He discussed the growth of the show’s audience, efforts to expand digital distribution, and plans to reach younger demographics through new media channels.

The hour concluded with listener calls, including a caller originally from a socialist country who offered a personal perspective on socialism. Using a restaurant bill analogy, the caller described socialism as a system where costs and rewards are shared equally regardless of individual contribution. The exchange tied back to the show’s earlier discussion of the Democratic Party’s progressive wing and the rise of socialist candidates in major political races.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribi

Hour 2 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show focused heavily on the developing South Carolina Republican Senate primary, following the death of longtime Senator Lindsey Graham and the appointment of his sister, Darlene Graham, to temporarily fill the seat. Clay and Buck examined the upcoming Republican runoff between Darlene Graham and Congressman Ralph Norman, arguing that the race has significant national implications because the winner is expected to become South Carolina’s next U.S. senator. The hosts emphasized that the contest represents a broader debate about political qualifications, voter expectations, and the standards required to serve in one of the most influential legislative bodies in the country.

A major portion of Hour 2 centered on a widely discussed moment from the South Carolina Senate debate in which Darlene Graham was asked whether Taiwan and the South China Sea are national security issues for the United States. Graham responded that national security was not her area of expertise and acknowledged that she was not well informed on the topic. Clay and Buck argued that the answer was deeply concerning for a sitting senator and candidate seeking a full six-year term. The hosts contended that foreign policy, Taiwan-China relations, military readiness, and national security are among the most important responsibilities facing U.S. senators and that candidates should possess at least a foundational understanding of those issues.

The discussion expanded into a broader conversation about political leadership, governance, and qualifications for public office. Buck argued that serving in the U.S. Senate requires far more than personal popularity or family connections, noting that senators vote on treaties, military actions, intelligence matters, and major foreign policy decisions. Both hosts questioned whether simply inheriting political goodwill or having access to experienced staff should be enough to justify election to the Senate. They repeatedly emphasized the distinction between temporarily filling a vacancy and earning a full term through demonstrated competence and policy knowledge.

Clay and Buck also compared Graham’s debate performance to a previous answer from Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Taiwan. The hosts replayed and analyzed both responses, ultimately arguing that while Ocasio-Cortez’s answer had previously deserved criticism, Graham’s response reflected an even greater lack of familiarity with the issue. The comparison sparked a broader discussion about consistency in political commentary and the importance of applying the same standards to Republicans and Democrats alike when evaluating public officials.

A significant listener-driven segment followed, as callers and talkback participants reacted to the hosts’ criticism. Some listeners accused Clay and Buck of unfairly targeting a Republican candidate, while others defended the hosts’ position and argued that elected officials should be prepared to discuss major international issues. The hosts pushed back on accusations of partisan bias, stressing that the debate was taking place within a Republican primary and that South Carolina voters were actively deciding who would hold the Senate seat for years to come. The conversation highlighted divisions within conservative circles over loyalty, qualifications, outsider candidates, and the role of experience in public service.

The show also featured an examination of anti-establishment political sentiment inside the Republican Party. Callers discussed frustration with career politicians and argued that many voters are increasingly attracted to nontraditional candidates who they believe better represent ordinary citizens. Clay and Buck explored whether a candidate’s lack of political experience should be viewed as a strength or a weakness, contrasting outsider appeal with the need for subject-matter expertise on issues ranging from foreign policy to economic policy and national security.

In addition to politics, the hosts briefly discussed the rapid growth and launch of Clay’s new digital media platform, Sport and State. Clay reported that heavy audience traffic had temporarily strained the website after listeners attempted to access the newly launched platform. He outlined plans for video streaming, sports coverage, political commentary, and expanded digital content, while thanking the audience for supporting the new venture and contributing to its strong initial traffic.

The program also included a discussion about Tesla vehicles, electric cars, self-driving technology, and consumer transportation trends after a listener called to describe his positive ownership experience. The conversation touched on vehicle operating costs, electric vehicle performance, autonomous driving capabilities, and the growing appeal of Tesla among conservative con

Hour 3 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show continued the program’s deep dive into the political fallout from the latest primary elections while placing particular emphasis on the increasingly contentious South Carolina Republican Senate runoff, the rise of Democratic socialism, and the hosts’ broader concerns about political qualifications, election integrity, and conservative cultural influence.

The hour opened with a recap of the previous night’s major political developments, including Byron Donalds’ victory in the Florida Republican gubernatorial primary, the defeat of Alex Vindman by Democratic Socialist candidate Angie Nixon in Florida’s Senate primary, and the ongoing controversy surrounding Alaska’s Senate race. Clay and Buck reiterated their belief that Nixon’s victory is evidence of the Democratic Party’s continued movement toward the political left and argued that Florida Democrats are increasingly embracing socialist candidates despite the state’s large population of voters with personal connections to countries that experienced authoritarian socialist governments. They also returned to the Alaska Senate race, again arguing that a candidate sharing the same name as incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan could create voter confusion and potentially influence a close election.

A major focus of Hour 3 remained the South Carolina Senate runoff between Darlene Graham, the sister of the late Senator Lindsey Graham, and Congressman Ralph Norman. The hosts revisited Graham’s debate performance, highlighting two moments that had attracted significant public attention: her inability to answer a question about Taiwan and the South China Sea, and a separate exchange in which she incorrectly stated that South Carolina has 50 million residents rather than roughly five million. Clay and Buck examined whether these mistakes reflected simple verbal errors or indicated a broader lack of preparation and policy knowledge for someone seeking a six-year Senate term.

The program then shifted into an extensive listener-driven discussion featuring callers from across South Carolina. Many callers expressed concern that voters were being asked to support a Senate candidate primarily because of family connections rather than demonstrated qualifications. Several participants argued that while Lindsey Graham had often been controversial within conservative circles, he was deeply knowledgeable on national security, foreign affairs, judicial nominations, and legislative issues. The callers and hosts debated whether voters should prioritize experience, ideology, familiarity, or competence when selecting a senator. The conversation repeatedly returned to the idea that a U.S. Senate seat is earned through public service and voter approval rather than inherited through political connections.

Buck expanded on the theme of political dynasties and nepotism, arguing that elected office should not function as a family heirloom. He criticized the broader concept of political succession based primarily on family relationships and argued that candidates should be judged on their individual merits and qualifications. Clay and Buck discussed how name recognition has historically influenced elections and contrasted that reality with their belief that major policy roles require demonstrated expertise and independent judgment. The hosts emphasized that voters should evaluate candidates based on their ability to perform the responsibilities of the office rather than their personal relationships to previous officeholders.

Several callers also made the case for Ralph Norman, pointing to his conservative record and willingness to challenge prevailing political narratives during the COVID-19 era. The hosts suggested they would invite both Norman and Graham onto the show to explain directly to listeners why each believes they deserve South Carolina voters’ support. Throughout the discussion, Clay and Buck repeatedly emphasized that the Senate runoff was not merely about filling an emotional void left by Lindsey Graham’s death but about selecting a representative who would shape policy decisions for years to come.

The hour also featured a lighter cultural and media segment as Clay discussed the ongoing launch and growth of his new Sport and State media company. He thanked listeners for their strong response to the platform’s video streaming capabilities and noted that audience demand had generated significant traffic. The hosts reflected on media growth, digital platforms, and the importance of creating alternative spaces for conservative and independent voices in sports, culture, and political commentary.

Later in Hour 3, the conversation shifted to culture, fashion, women’s media, and shifting social trends during an interview with Brittany Hugoboom, founder and editor-in-chief of Evie Ma

Are Flock cameras keeping Americans safe — or building a massive surveillance network?

On this episode of It’s a Numbers Game, Ryan Girdusky sits down with a top Flock Safety executive, Rahul Sidu for a wide-ranging conversation about the controversial license plate reader technology spreading across the country.

They tackle some of the biggest questions surrounding Flock cameras: Can police use them to track people improperly? How long is vehicle data retained? Can Flock employees access camera data? Does the company sell information to data brokers? What happens when the technology misreads a license plate? And where should Americans draw the line between public safety and personal privacy?

Rahul also responds to concerns about police officers allegedly misusing license plate databases, explains the company's auditing and accountability systems, and addresses claims involving facial recognition, data sharing and cameras remaining in place after local contracts end.

Plus, Ryan weighs in on Sen. Jon Ossoff, his potential presidential ambitions and his controversial comments about Trump aide Natalie Harp. Ryan also answers listener questions about voter turnout, the 2026 midterms, North Carolina's Senate race and whether Democrats can successfully campaign as moderates.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Former CIA intelligence analyst and targeter Sarah Adams joins Tudor Dixon for a warning about foreign influence operations targeting American politics and elections.

Adams breaks down what she describes as the growing alliance between Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), Islamist political organizations, and political candidates—and explains why Americans should pay closer attention to the organizations, money, and influence networks operating behind campaigns.

Tudor and Sarah examine concerns surrounding Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR Action, campus organizations, and the role social media influencers can play in amplifying foreign-backed narratives—sometimes without even realizing where the messaging originated.

They also explore why Adams believes the threat isn't limited to the political left. Could similar influence operations fracture Republicans and conservatives by pushing voters toward third parties or convincing them to stay home?

Plus, Adams reveals a stunning vulnerability inside Washington: congressional staffers aren't universally required to undergo background checks. She explains what she witnessed while working on Capitol Hill and why she believes Congress needs stronger counterintelligence safeguards.

It's a wide-ranging conversation about foreign influence, election interference, political extremism, national security, and whether Americans recognize the threat before it becomes too powerful to ignore.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Emily Kopp of the Daily Caller News Foundation is back on the show, and actually reading the documents coming off Anthony Fauci's government phone. What's in the January 2021 texts should stop you cold, and where the paper trail leads next is even bigger.

What you'll hear:

• Kopp walks through the January 2021 text chain between Fauci, the CDC Director, and the Surgeon General — and what pregnant women were told days later

• David breaks down why the warning from inside Fauci's own institute changes the story

• The FDA email asking for a safety study — and why it never ran • A 2003 CIA memo describing a network of "ostensibly civilian" scientists

• David's own eight anthrax shots as a SEAL medic — the biodefense machine from the inside

• Where Rand Paul and Ron Johnson drive the investigation next

Emily Kopp is a senior investigative reporter for the Daily Caller News Foundation and one of the most-cited journalists on COVID origins and gain-of-function research. Follow her reporting at dailycaller.com. 

✅ Sponsors: ☕️ Black Rifle Coffee: https://www.blackriflecoffee.com/

🏫 Get coaching by David Rutherford: https://www.froglogicinstitute.com/

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Regime change is one of the most controversial ideas in foreign policy, but what does it actually mean, when has it worked, and why has it often failed? Steve Yates examines major case studies from Iran, Guatemala, Chile, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Germany, and Japan to explain how governments are removed, what comes afterward, and why the hardest question is rarely how to topple a regime but how to build a stable future. Listen now and join the conversation about one of the most consequential and misunderstood tools of statecraft. Follow Nation States with Yates for clear, common-sense insights where Steve Yates serves as your personal national security advisor, breaking down world events in ways that matter to Main Street, not just Washington. Connect with the show at NationStatesYates@Gmail.com and follow on X @NSWithYates.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin joins Lisa Boothe to discuss the battle for the 2026 midterm elections, the affordability crisis facing American families, school choice, parents' rights and what he sees as the growing influence of socialism inside the Democratic Party.

Youngkin, who won one of the country's most closely watched battleground races in Virginia in 2021, explains what Republicans need to do to win over voters in a difficult midterm environment. He argues that the GOP must acknowledge the pain Americans are feeling from inflation and higher gas prices while making a stronger case for its economic agenda.

Youngkin also discusses his push to expand educational freedom and school choice through a federal tax credit that can help families pay for private school tuition, tutoring, transportation and additional educational services. He explains why he's pressuring Democratic governors to opt into the program and why he believes teachers unions remain one of the biggest obstacles to expanding parental choice.

Lisa and Youngkin revisit the famous moment from the 2021 Virginia governor's race when Terry McAuliffe said he didn't believe parents should be telling schools what to teach. Youngkin explains why that moment crystallized a fundamental political divide over who should make decisions for America's children.

Finally, Youngkin sounds the alarm over the ideological direction of the Democratic Party, arguing that socialists are winning its internal battle and that Republicans have an opportunity to contrast their agenda with the progressive left heading into November.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.